|
|||
I also realised that my gggrandmother's brother (Samuel Johnson, brother of Elizabeth Johnson, married to Frank Wright - their daughter Elizabeth Wright married Harry Sproston, my ggrandfather) was also killed at Diglake. This is in addition to the four members of the Sproson family (not direct relatives of mine but certainly connected to the 'main' Sproston branch from Middlewich). This should not of course surprise me, as the Butty system obviously involved employing your relatives and friends, plus most of the 77 men were locals and had lived in the Audley area for generations, so they are bound to be related somehow if you look far enough. Having been born away down south I have no real knowledge of the life of a miner, although my grandfather, Frank Sproston, was a miner all his life (he was born in Audley and worked at 'Trentham Deep' where he was once buried by a rock fall). He died in 1960, some ten years before I was born, so I had no opportunity to get to know him or ask him about his working life. Frank's father, Harry, was also a miner in Butt Lane, as were all Harry's brothers, and Frank's grandfather, Samuel Sproston, was killed in an accident at 'Slapenfield Colliery' (about which I have been unable to discover anything at all) in 1879, leaving 9 children and a pregnant wife behind. Any information about Diglake which I can use to help educate local children about the lives of the miners, and the debt that we owe them, would be greatly appreciated. If you would like to know more about my intended use of this information, please do let me know. Kind regards |
|
||
13 Feb 2005 I have just updated the Diglake site again with some 1871 census info, which shows that several of the men were brothers or cousins. The only miner I have any doubts about now is Thomas Taylor, died aged 14/15. There is a Thomas Taylor of the correct age in the household of John Guise, another of the victims. He looks likely, but it is such a common name I'm not certain. There are other Thomas Taylors in Audley of about the right age, none who would have been exactly 14 in 1895 however. The boys have been hardest to identify as the Diglake Disaster Fund Account Book gives no family information about them, just whether the family received a payment of £10 or £20 (for over 16s). Susan Bradley |